🔗 Share this article

Are your professional networking followers recognizing you as a thought leader? Do numerous commenters applauding your insights on expanding your venture? Are headhunters reaching out to discuss opportunities?

Should that not be the case, the reason might be your gender.

The Test: Changing Gender Identity to achieve Better Visibility

Numerous women joined a collective LinkedIn experiment recently after popular discussions indicated that switching their gender to "man" enhanced their platform visibility.

Other testers modified their profiles to include what they called "bro-coded" language - adding action-focused business buzzwords like "propel", "transform" and "accelerate". Anecdotally, their visibility similarly increased.

Algorithmic Bias Concerns Raised

The improved metrics has led some to speculate whether an inherent sexism in the platform's system favors male users who use professional networking terminology.

Similar to most major social media platforms, LinkedIn utilizes a computerized system to determine which posts appear to which members - boosting some while reducing others.

Company Statement

In a recent blog post, LinkedIn recognized the phenomenon but claimed it does not consider "personal characteristics" when deciding post visibility. Rather, the company explained that "numerous factors" influence how content perform.

Modifying profile gender in your settings does not influence how your content appears in results or timelines.

Personal Experiences

Simone Bonnett, who modified her gender identifiers to "he/him" and her name to "Simon E", reported extraordinary results.

"The statistics I'm observing show a 1,600% increase in profile views and a 1,300% increase in content views," she commented.

Megan Cornish, a marketing expert, started testing after noticing her reach decrease substantially.

The Method

• First, she modified her profile gender to "man"
• Then, she used AI tools to rewrite her profile using "masculine-oriented" language
• Finally, she repurposed old posts with similar "agentic" style

The result was instantaneous: a more than fourfold rise in visibility within seven days.

The Negative Aspect

Although the success, Cornish expressed unhappiness with the approach.

"Previously, my content were more personal - concise and clever, but also friendly and human," she stated. "Now, the bro-coded version was forceful and confident - like a Caucasian man being overly confident."

She abandoned the experiment after one week, saying "Each day I continued, and outcomes got better, I became angrier."

Varying Outcomes

Not all testers encountered positive outcomes. Cass Cooper who modified both her gender to "man" and her ethnicity to "white" described a reduction in reach and interaction.

"We understand there's algorithmic bias, but it's extremely difficult to comprehend how it operates in particular situations or why," she remarked.

Wider Consequences

These tests occur alongside ongoing discussions about LinkedIn's distinctive position as both a business platform and community site.

Recent changes in recent months have apparently resulted in female creators experiencing markedly lower visibility, leading to unofficial tests where identical posts by men and women received dramatically unequal audience engagement.

Technical Explanation

According to LinkedIn, the network uses AI systems to categorize and spread content based on various elements, including post content and the member's career profile.

The company claims it regularly evaluates its systems, including "checks for inequalities based on gender."

A spokesperson proposed that current reductions in certain members' visibility might stem from increased competition due to additional posts on the network.

Changing Landscape

According to a tester observed, "bro-coding" appears to be growing on the network.

"People often view LinkedIn as more businesslike and refined," she commented. "That's changing. It's turning into increasingly competitive and unpredictable."